Siena
W-L: ( 9- 2) PR = 90.9388Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 206 A Boston Univ PATRIOT ( 5- 5, 94.2) 7-23 214 H Hofstra CAA ( 3- 7, 89.0) 14-10 217 H Binghamton AE ( 2- 8, 86.2) 14- 5 224 H Air Force ASUN ( 3- 7, 89.4) 21- 9 228 A Dartmouth IVY ( 4- 6, 92.9) 6-13 303 A Le Moyne NEC ( 3- 9, 84.4) 11- 7 307 A Quinnipiac MAAC ( 3- 8, 86.0) 18-11 321 H Manhattan MAAC ( 2- 9, 84.4) 15- 9 325 A Marist MAAC ( 6- 4, 89.3) 11-10 328 H Canisius MAAC ( 3- 8, 84.8) 10- 5 404 A Iona MAAC ( 2-12, 84.3) 24- 7 411 H Sacred Heart MAAC (10- 1, 90.8) 414 A Albany AE ( 6- 4, 92.8) 418 A Mt St Marys MAAC ( 3- 8, 85.1) 422 H Merrimack MAAC ( 4- 8, 86.8)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
206 A Boston Univ 7-23 -16 -5 - -2.18
214 H Hofstra 14-10 4 4 0.49
217 H Binghamton 14- 5 9 6 0.72
224 H Air Force 21- 9 12 3 + 3.92
228 A Dartmouth 6-13 -7 -3 - -3.54
303 A Le Moyne 11- 7 4 5 -1.03
307 A Quinnipiac 18-11 7 3 + 3.62
321 H Manhattan 15- 9 6 8 -1.00
325 A Marist 11-10 1 0 0.87
328 H Canisius 10- 5 5 8 - -2.00
404 A Iona 24- 7 17 5 1.88
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 206 A Boston Univ 7-23 -16 -5 - -2.18 228 A Dartmouth 6-13 -7 -3 - -3.54 328 H Canisius 10- 5 5 8 - -2.00 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 224 H Air Force 21- 9 12 3 + 3.92 307 A Quinnipiac 18-11 7 3 + 3.62 |
Siena Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force | Siena | Siena | ||
| Albany | Albany | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Albany | |
| Army | Army | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Army | |
| Bellarmine | Siena | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Siena | |
| Binghamton | Siena | Siena | ||
| Boston Univ | Boston Univ | Boston Univ | ||
| Brown | Brown | Brown | ||
| Bryant | Siena | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Siena | |
| Bucknell | Bucknell | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Bucknell | |
| Canisius | Siena | Siena | ||
| Cleveland State | Siena | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Siena | |
| Colgate | Colgate | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Colgate | |
| Cornell | Cornell | Cornell | ||
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | Dartmouth | ||
| Delaware | Siena | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Siena | |
| Denver | Denver | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Denver | |
| Detroit Mercy | Siena | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Siena | |
| Drexel | Drexel | Drexel | ||
| Duke | Duke | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Duke | |
| Fairfield | Siena | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Siena | |
| Georgetown | Georgetown | Georgetown | ||
| Hampton | Siena | Siena | ||
| Harvard | Harvard | Harvard 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| High Point | High Point | High Point | ||
| Hobart | Siena | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Siena | |
| Hofstra | Siena | Siena | ||
| Holy Cross | Siena | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Siena | |
| Iona | Siena | Siena | ||
| Jacksonville | Jacksonville | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Jacksonville | |
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Lafayette | Siena | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Siena | |
| Le Moyne | Siena | Siena | ||
| Lehigh | Lehigh | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Lehigh | |
| LIU | Siena | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Siena | |
| Loyola | Loyola | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Loyola | |
| Manhattan | Siena | Siena | ||
| Marist | Siena | Siena | ||
| Marquette | Siena | Siena | ||
| Maryland | Maryland | Maryland | ||
| Massachusetts | Massachusetts | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Massachusetts | |
| UMassLowell | Siena | Siena 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mercer | Siena | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Siena | |
| Mercyhurst | Siena | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Siena | |
| Merrimack | Siena | Siena 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Michigan | Michigan | Michigan | ||
| Monmouth | Siena | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Siena | |
| Mt St Marys | Siena | Siena 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Navy | Navy | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Navy | |
| NJIT | Siena | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Siena | |
| North Carolina | North Carolina | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | North Carolina | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Ohio State | |
| Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Pennsylvania | |
| Penn State | Penn State | Penn State | ||
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton | ||
| Providence | Siena | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Siena | |
| Queens | Siena | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Siena | |
| Quinnipiac | Siena | Siena | ||
| Richmond | Richmond | Richmond | ||
| Robert Morris | Siena | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Siena | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Rutgers | |
| Sacred Heart | Siena | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Siena | |
| St Bonnies | Siena | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Siena | |
| St Johns | Siena | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Siena | |
| St Josephs | St Josephs | St Josephs | ||
| Stony Brook | Siena | tied - ( 5- 0) ( 5- 0) | Siena | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Syracuse | |
| Towson | Towson | Towson | ||
| UMBC | Siena | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Siena | |
| Utah | Utah | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Utah | |
| Vermont | Siena | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Siena | |
| Villanova | Villanova | Villanova | ||
| Virginia | Virginia | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Virginia | |
| VMI | Siena | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Siena | |
| Wagner | Siena | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Siena | |
| Yale | Yale | Yale 3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
PowerWise = 39
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 10.36
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Boston Univ ( 5- 5, 94.2) 7-23 -5.68 15.61 1.55 0.94 -1.95
0 H Hofstra ( 3- 7, 89.0) 14-10 -10.92 10.37 -1.55 0.94 16.63
0 H Binghamton ( 2- 8, 86.2) 14- 5 -13.69 7.61 -1.55 0.94 11.42
0 H Air Force ( 3- 7, 89.4) 21- 9 -10.50 10.80 -1.55 0.94 17.43
0 A Dartmouth ( 4- 6, 92.9) 6-13 -7.05 14.25 1.55 0.94 -2.59
0 A Le Moyne ( 3- 9, 84.4) 11- 7 -15.54 5.76 1.55 0.94 13.76
0 A Quinnipiac ( 3- 8, 86.0) 18-11 -13.89 7.41 1.55 0.94 16.87
0 H Manhattan ( 2- 9, 84.4) 15- 9 -15.51 5.79 -1.55 0.94 7.99
0 A Marist ( 6- 4, 89.3) 11-10 -10.64 10.66 1.55 0.94 23.00
0 H Canisius ( 3- 8, 84.8) 10- 5 -15.07 6.23 -1.55 0.94 8.82
0 A Iona ( 2-12, 84.3) 24- 7 -15.63 5.67 1.55 0.94 13.59
------
124.98
|
winning pts = 129.5154 losing points = -4.5390
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------